Why is Earl Spencer such a Mean Father?
Article From the Daily Mail, London…..
Serial adulterer. Hypocrite. Bully. And a reputation, effortlessly acquired, for insensitivity bordering on the boorish.
Earl Spencer has been accused of many things down the years. Sometimes it has seemed as if the Spencer name could hardly sink any lower. Maybe it can.
The reason for this observation can be found in the contents of a High Court writ served on the lawyers who represented him in his bitter divorce from his second wife Caroline, the mother of his children, Ned, six, and Lara, four.
Lawsuit: Earl Spencer with his ex-wife Caroline
The case is about alleged failings in the legal advice Charles Spencer received that resulted, he says, in Caroline getting an extra £1 million as part of her final settlement.
Behind those bare facts, however, lies the full story. For the information contained in the document probably tells us more about Charles Spencer himself than any interview; in particular what some might construe as his ‘penny pinching’ attitude.
Princess Diana’s brother, after all, is one of Britain’s wealthiest men, with a personal fortune of around £100 million. Yet, we now know he was unhappy about the amount of money that should be set aside to provide for his own flesh and blood.
Ned and Lara will each get £30,000 a year. These payments will continue until his son and daughter (the earl also has four older children from his first marriage) complete their secondary education.
But what did their father think he should have paid for their upkeep? Answer: £25,000. In other words, a £5,000 per child per year saving for the man with the £100 million fortune.
Apart from the £30,000, Ned and Lara will also get £26,000 a year each for such things as ‘domestic assistance’ and medical bills. Their father, on the other hand, wanted to pay them £15,000 each.
The Earl was given credit for his impassioned address at the funeral of his sister Princess Diana, in 1997
Now, to you or me, the sums might seem enormous. But bear in mind that putting the children through private education alone – if that is what their mother chooses for them – could eat up much of that money. The fees at top public schools such as Eton, which the Earl himself attended, come close to £30,000 a year. Charles Spencer blames his barrister Sir Nicholas Mostyn, QC, and his colleagues for having to dig deeper into his pockets to provide for his own family.
They did not warn him, he says, that changes in the law meant his divorce hearing last year would not be in private. To avoid the public gaze, he settled out of court. He insists his negotiating strategy would have changed had he been informed of the rule change earlier.
It meant, he said, that Caroline, 42, – former wife of media guru Matthew Freud and known to friends as ‘Pidge’ – eventually walked away with a £5.65 million settlement, instead of £4.5 million.
Surely no one who has any knowledge of Charles Spencer’s track record as a husband would begrudge her a single penny. He and Caroline had been together for six years when he left her in 2006 for a glamorous American reporter who had been sent by her TV station to interview him. After 18 months he dumped her, too.
The very thing Charles Spencer feared most, of course – his private life being opened up to public scrutiny – has now come to pass because of his lawsuit. Not that Charles Spencer thinks he has done anything wrong. He never does.
In his own eyes, at least, he is the victim: of the Press (‘vicious’, ‘ vindictive’, ‘dishonest’ and ‘highly intrusive’ is how his writ describes the media); and of Caroline herself, whose original requests during their divorce negotiations he deemed to be ‘beyond any reasonable expectation’.
What his divorce document doesn’t disclose is the exact fate of the former martial home; the Georgian townhouse, with elegant porticoed facade and overlooking Regent’s Canal in North West London, where Caroline and the children – his children – had been living happily since their parents separated four years ago and where Caroline wanted to remain.
It is believed to have been the principal reason why their divorce dragged on for so long.
The sticking point has now been resolved. As part of the settlement, Charles has got the house and Caroline has moved out into rented accommodation.
So much for Charles Spencer’s devotion to his ‘blood family’, which he famously referred to in his impassioned address at his sister Princess Diana’s funeral in 1997.
But then what should we expect from a man who has shown such a shameless approach throughout his personal life?
During his first divorce in 1997, from model Victoria Lockwood, the mother of his four other children, she claimed he was a pathological philanderer in the five months that she was in an addiction clinic battling anorexia and drinking problems. Spencer denies these claims.
The disregard manifested itself in other ways. At a party, when he was reminded of his late father’s remark that he should stick with Victoria through ‘thick and thin’, Spencer famously joked to guests that Victoria was ‘thin, and certainly thick.’ He insists this was not meant to be taken seriously.
The Earl with his first wife, South African model Victoria Lockwood. The pair are seen here holding their twins
His divorce from Victoria was settled in South Africa, avoiding an expensive English divorce award. Victoria, 45, mother of Kitty, 19, twins Eliza and Katya, 18, and Louis, 16, still lives in Cape Town.
After Victoria came Caroline, of course. We have already mentioned how he walked out on her for another woman four years ago.
She was American television reporter Coleen Sullivan. The glamorous Coleen threw up her career – and a long-term fiance – to make her life with Charles Spencer in England after going to interview him at Althorp about Princess Diana. After two years, he decided that life without Coleen would be preferable to life with her.
Back in Bonny Doon, a dusty township south of San Francisco, her father Michael Sullivan, screwed up his face when asked this week about his daughter’s relationship with Spencer. ‘He’s a jerk,’ declared Mr Sullivan, a former police officer in his 60s. ‘He [Spencer] can’t handle strong women.’
It seems that Coleen took exception to his unreasonable behaviour and was not afraid to speak her mind. ‘My daughter spoke up and said: “Hey, you can’t do that,” ‘ recalls Mr Sullivan. ‘And he couldn’t take it. She’s much better off without him.’ Coleen is now working as an anchor for a TV station in southern California.
As for the Earl? Well, he now divides his time between London, his family’s ancestral seat at Althorp in Northamptonshire, and Cornwall, where his new girlfriend has a home.
A tribute in memory of the Princess was laid by the Spencer family at Althorp House, Northampton
When he is in London, the Earl’s gleaming Maserati can be seen parked outside the house. Even the cheapest Maserati, combining Italian style and engineering perfection, costs in excess of £50,000, which, it could be argued, rather puts those
‘maintenance payments’ into perspective.
The latest woman on his arm, Bianca Eliot, 34, a mother of three and widow of the late Bohemian aristocrat Jago Eliot, has a grace-and-favour home in the Cornish village of Tideford, on the Port Eliot estate of her father-in-law, the Earl of St Germans.
The couple met at the Groucho Club in Soho two years ago. Spencer proposed in March and the couple are said to be planning a wedding possibly as early as September, raising the unlikely prospect of Earl Spencer one day becoming the nominal head by marriage of both the 6,000acre Port Eliot estate, as well as Althorp, with an extended family of nine children ranging in age from four to 19.
The irony, of course, is that throughout his life, Charles Spencer has shown he is ill-suited to family life. That is evident, some might say, from the writ he has now served on his team of lawyers.
The maintenance payments must be nothing more than small change to Charles Spencer. But having said that, the upkeep of Althorp, which is shrouded in scaffolding, is a major financial drain. Items from the family’s estate, you may remember, including a Rubens painting, were recently sold at auction to raise £10 million for a new roof.
Also, the number of paying visitors visiting Althorp is down because of all the building work. (Inquiries into any details of the earl’s finances lead to an immediate letter from his libel lawyers).
But let’s return to the divorce lawyers at the centre of our story.
Charles Spencer’s writ discloses embarrassing remarks his barrister Sir Nicholas made about the High Court judge who decided the Spencers’ divorce hearing in June 2009 should be open to the Press.
And it was this aspect of the case that made the papers this week, rather than the more fascinating details about Charles Spencer and the levels of financial provision he has made for his children.
Perhaps it was understandable in the circumstances.
Sir Nicholas, a keen farmer, named seven pigs after the judge in disgust at his verdict in an email to his client, including: ‘Selfregarding’, ‘Pompous’ and ‘Pillock’ – names, no doubt, earl Spencer’s critics would claim apply equally to him.
With perhaps one other: ‘Penny Pinching.’
A collection of items from Althorp auctioned a Christie’s earlier this month